- Ray Allen (25.3 ppg) scored 30 and 32 in a home-and-home split
- Michael Redd (28.1 ppg) shot his way to 45 points in a win
- Chris Paul (18.7 ppg) sliced his way to 26 in a win
- Joe Johnson (28.4 ppg) scored 30 in a loss a Kobe-less squad
- Jason Terry (15.3 ppg) dropped 26 in a win in Dallas
- Gilbert Arenas (28.0 ppg) gets a career-high and franchise-record 60 points
Granted, except for Terry, all of these players are All-Stars, so I expect a good game from them. I just didn't expect season bests against a Phil Jackson coached team.
So who or what's to blame for this? Did Chucky Atkins sneak his way back on the Lakers? Did Rudy Tomjanovich ask in on all defensive meetings? Did Kobe go back to wearing the heavy Adidas Kobe Two's?
Nope, but there are several factors for the Lakers defensive troubles. First, Kobe is still nursing his knee back to health. As much as his offensive game has returned to last-year's form, he still tends to rest up on defense. I'd say that he's a few weeks from returning to full health.
Secondly, there's the poor play of Smush Parker on both ends of the floor. Whether it's fall-out from last year's disappearing act in the playoffs or the pressure of Jordan Farmar's play, Smush is not the same player as last year. He's not coming with the same fire on defense. Many teams are running screen-and-rolls and he's not putting the effort to get through them. This causes match-up problems as the Lakers are forced to switch defenders. Plus, on offense Parker is missing a lot of outside jumpers (A LOT OF THEM!), which lead to long rebounds and fast break points by the opposition.
Finally, the Lakers bigs are very slow in their defensive rotations. By the time Kobe and Smush are beat on drives, the bigs should rotate over, close the lane and stop the penetration. Instead, both Andrew Bynum and Kwame Brown are a step slow and end up fouling the guy. Arenas scorched the Lakers with his penetration, shooting an obscene 27 freethrows.
So is there a solution? Besides awareness and time (until Kobe's healed), the Lakers are forced to play with the hand their dealt. They still need 20 minutes a game from Parker and having him switch roles with Farmar, though desirable is not the way to go. Parker will just pout his way out the action and forces the Lakers to use Sasha Vujacic... and we don't need that. I guess it all comes down to practice and defensive effort.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-18-2006 @ 1:06PM
shoals said...
does the point guard/pff-guard distinction mean anything here?
(that's not meant to be snarky)
Reply
12-18-2006 @ 1:36PM
TheHype said...
Oh word! Kicksology.net sighting!! Good times
Reply
12-18-2006 @ 1:53PM
Craig said...
Point blank: No! (But still a good question.)
The opposing "back-court" is killing the Lakers. Whether it's slashing players like Terry, Paul and Arenas or pure scorers like Allen, Redd and Johnson; players are dropping high numbers because: Kobe's slow, Smush sucks and the bigs have trouble rotating over to cut off the lane.
Teams are learning that you can attack the Lakers defense and get yourself to the line. Even the more traditional jump shooter like Redd drove the lane and had 10 freethrow attempts.
Smush Parker may start off the game guarding the more traditional point guards, but when the game is on the line Kobe will lock up against the better player. Against the Spurs, Kobe was on Tony Longoria during crunch time.
I hope I cleared that up for you.
Reply
12-18-2006 @ 2:20PM
Craig said...
I definately had Kicksology book marked. Too bad they stopped doing it.
Reply
12-18-2006 @ 4:46PM
Unsilent Majority said...
craig, you truly believe that gil should be categorized as a "slasher" and not a "pure scorer"?
Reply
12-19-2006 @ 11:10AM
Craig said...
He was a slasher againt the Lakers on Sunday. But you're right, he's more of a scorer, especially with that insane shooting range.
Reply