Skip to Main Content

NBA Considering Penalizing Floppers

1/26/2007 3:19 AM ET By mjd

    • mjd
Interesting and potentially huge news from NBA VP of basketball ops, Stu Jackson ... the NBA is considering making flops a foulable offense.
"They're really difficult to determine in real time. They're meant to fool an official," Jackson told reporters today. "Are we going to be wrong more times than not? It's tough, but we're looking at it."
You know, my first reaction when I read this was, "Thank God." But then I started thinking ... this would bring about a myriad of issues. We're not talking about changing one rule, we're talking about changing the entire way that a game is officiated. In terms of the amount of change it would bring to the NBA landscape, this would make the microfiber ball seem as significant Scot Pollard changing his facial hair configuration.

Flopping is dishonest, and it does cheapen the game, I'm not arguing that it doesn't ... but flopping has become something of an art, too. It's an acquired skill, and even though it's inherently dishonest, it can end up adding honesty to the game.

Fact: There are a lot of times when a legitimate offensive foul wouldn't get called if the defender didn't exaggerate it. And this is what I'm talking about when I say that it would change entirely the way a game is called. If you're going to assess a technical for flopping, then you damn sure better get the offensive foul calls right. If Shaun Livingston runs into Ben Wallace, and Ben Wallace doesn't move, it's still an offensive foul ... just as much as it would be if Shaq barrelled into Rip Hamilton and sent Rip to a premature death.

The problem with this is that the Livingston/Wallace example never gets called. Right or wrong, NBA officials won't call the foul unless someone goes flying. If you're going to try to body up Shaq, and not just flail when he backs into you ... you're not going to the the call as often, even if you should.

And you'd have to get that right, every single time. They'd have to fundamentally change what they're looking for. Again in the Livingston/Wallace example, it's only natural for Wallace to flop ... really, he's helping the right call get made. If Wallace exaggerated it a bit, and he ended up taking a technical foul ... I don't know if that would be right.

Read More: , ,

Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Tweets

  • by NBAFanHouseNBA players union revamps website, misspells names of two exec VPs -- "Eaton" Thomas and Theo "Ratlif" http://bit.ly/cYSUyF
  • by NBAFanHouseNBA's amateur dunk contest will overshadow the real thing: http://bit.ly/bhV3rA
  • by NBAFanHouseWas the Ray Allen trade Ainge's greatest moment? Can he make magic again? http://bit.ly/b1xRea
  • by NBAFanHouseRT @teamziller: I agree with @gswscribe and @timkawakami: waiving Claxton right now is confounding: http://bit.ly/aNeJy0
Super Bowl Ads

Writers

Most Discussed

Now Commenting

Sports News from FanHouse Partners

FanHouse.com

Best of the Web >>>

Get NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, NASCAR and college sports news from FanHouse including stats, scores, results, and player updates from pro and college leagues.

Aol Sports. Back To The Top