Well, they had the Artest press conference. And while none of my conspiracy-minded questions got answered, there was at least one totally bizarre occurrence. A remorseful and emotional Artest addressed the situation for the first time in front of the media.Okay, so there's the heartfelt apology from Artest. Moments later, though, here's Petrie:
"First, I want to apologize to my wife, to my family ... " Forty seven seconds later he raised his head with tears in his eyes and continued.
"I want to apologize to the Kings, to my teammates, the NBA, everybody who supported me," he said. "For another incident to come up is very unfortunate, and I definitely want to apologize for my behavior."
Petrie said the decision to bring Artest back was based largely on the presumption of innocence inherent to the court system.I'm having trouble finding the words the say this politely, but huh? Artest is crying, atoning, acknowledging he's done wrong yet again...and Petrie is talking innocent until proven guilty? I guess Artest feels bad that he's put everyone through this ordeal, even if he did nothing wrong. If he's not admitting he hit his wife, exactly what wrongdoing is he all choked up about?
"The presumption of innocence still stands," Petrie said. "He's a basketball player, and at some point he needs to get back on the court."




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-10-2007 @ 6:50PM
Ron Artest said...
I'm sorry I had to beat that Ho.
Reply
3-10-2007 @ 10:03PM
almanorjoey said...
How About " I'm sorry that i didn't see this comming years ago, should have divorced the nice lady and made sure the next one dosn't like to beat on men, throw things, then call the cops for D.V. revenge, when they get pissed.
It happens people, it happens.
Reply
3-11-2007 @ 9:46AM
greg said...
someone once said that its a privledge not a right to play in the NBA and i think that artest has used up all of his privledges.
Reply