The Pacers have been up and down and up, but little of it has to do with single star Jermaine O'Neal. J.O., the subject of infinite trade rumors all summer, has played hurt all season... and his play has been consistently underwhelming (13/7 on 39% shooting -- he finished last year at 19/9 on 44% shooting and it was considered a poor effort).But the mediocrity is easily explainable -- not only has J.O. been playing hurt, he's been playing really hurt. Jim O'Brien told the Indianapolis Star's Mike Wells earlier this week O'Neal's been playing at 60% health. That's terrible, for player and team. It appears things aren't catastrophic down there in the knee -- O'Neal might play Sunday, but only if the medical staff deems J.O. reaches the 90% threshold in terms of how the knee feels. What's the difference between a 60% knee on Wednesday and a 90% knee on Sunday? Who knows?
Despite J.O.'s lackluster season, it's easy to see why he's so important to the Pacers -- his defense. According to 82games.com, Indy gives up 3.2 points per 48 minutes less when O'Neal is on the court. Add in that Jermaine typically faces mostly starters, and it's even more impressive. Whether he is staying in Indianapolis or heading to brighter pastures, his defense is what makes him a star. If he can hold down the paint at 60 or 90 or 110%, he has a ton of value.





















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-24-2007 @ 4:49PM
JBuck said...
This post sounds like JO is crucial to the Pacers success but aren't they a one-loss team without him and winless with him??? I could careless if they gave up 20 more points a game as long as they're much more fluid offense scored 25 more points without him. The play of the Pacers is dramatically improved with him on the bench and its glaringly obvious. I would trade him for ANYBODY just so that OBrien doesn't feel its necessary to play him just because his pay is so much when he, Bird and everyone in Conseco can see that his presence hurts the team. If JO was 90% I can't see why you would play him if you are winning without him
Reply