It would be very easy to assume that Jerry West had his grubby little old man hands all over trade that sent Pau Gasol to the Lakers for what some important NBA people, like Gregg Popovich, are calling "beyond comprehension." He is, after all, the strongest possible link that you could find between the Lakers and Grizzlies. But in reality, West's hands are probably as far from grubby as they get and he had absolutely nothing to do with the deal, if you're willing to believe him. Mitch Kupchak's acquisition of 7-footer Pau Gasol from the Grizzlies for Kwame Brown, Javaris Crittenton and two first-round draft picks -- a trade West said he was not involved in, contradicting the rumors and conspiracy theories that have buzzed around the Internet -- was a good one, he believes.West also added that it was a "... terrific deal for the Lakers ..." and a "... steal for the present ..." Well, I think everyone has heard more staunch denials (at least act like it was good for both sides, Jerry), but West, in my book, has enough cred to trust his word. On the other hand, it's pretty freaking ludicrous to try and ignore the fact that West has worked with and molded two organizations, Los Angeles and Memphis, over the recent years, and those two teams just happened to be involved in a blockbuster deal that got them both exactly what they wanted. Then again, when has force feeding Chris Wallace a fifth of Grey Goose over the course of eighteen holes and having him sign "your scorecard" at the end of the round* actually count as being "involved" in anything? Seriously though, even if West called Wallace up and told him to take the Lakers' deal ... who cares? Since when has being in the business world not been about who you know?
*Most likely a fictional scenario.





















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-09-2008 @ 4:28PM
frank said...
the same way McHale did it with Boston sending KG to the Celtics ( He is a Celtic to the end ) Jerry did it with the Lakers (he is a Laker at heart) plus is benefitial for both teams in the long run is nothing wrong with this picture and also a good business transaction .
Reply
2-09-2008 @ 8:16PM
frank said...
Gasol is a much better deal then KG , Gasol is younger better credentials and 5 years with a team in which he carried the worst part unlike KG with minnie that lasted 12 years with a lot of help and did not amount to go over 1st round of the play-offs and prompt to injuries so out the 2 teams Lakers have an advantage in paper let's wait for the results,Celtics have to go pass Detroit,Orlando and Toronto the Lakers have to go thru Spurs , Hornets ,Suns ,Dallas ,Houston,Portland ,Warriors a lot harder then the Celtics have in paper.
Reply
2-10-2008 @ 9:51AM
frank said...
Correction Gasol has been 4 years with Memphis his 1st year 2002 Rookie of the year 2006 gold medal and this year not completed was going to be his 5th year but he is in Lakers uniform this year,Done.
Reply