After losing Baron Davis and losing out on Elton Brand, most pundits have quickly assumed the Warriors would stay true to their lottery roots for the immediate future. Chris Mullin insists he'll be able to keep restricted free agents Monta Ellis and Andris Biedrins, and the likelihood of the Lakers matching Ronny Turiaf's offer sheet looks smaller and smaller each day. Corey Maggette is in town, and Don Nelson has been saying Ellis will be able to play point full-time for the Dubs.Could this team actually be pretty good?
If preseason prognostications are iffy, ones made in the middle of July are downright laughable. But hear me out. Davis was an elite point guard -- a potent scorer, an efficient ball-handler, a strong rebounder, and a good passer. His shooting, though, is suspect. Ellis is also a strong rebounder, he cut his turnovers way down last season, and he's almost as potent a scorer as Davis already, at age 22. While Ellis doesn't and probably will not rack up assists, he's a much more efficient shooter. He boasts no range but realizes this and refuses the three ... unlike Davis, who despite mediocre three-point shooting percentages his entire career still took a third of his shots from deep last year.
The central question that will decide the immediate success of the Warriors: do the other players need a point guard to set them up? Maggette is already a firm 'no.' He played with some unholy combination of Brevin Knight and decrepit Sam Cassell last year, and had some of the best scoring and shooting numbers of his already-strong career. Stephen Jackson's basically a point-forward who has little trouble creating.
Biedrins could use some inside dishes, but currently gets most of his production on clean-up duty. No one knows who will get the heavy minutes at power forward -- Al Harrington could be shipped out, Brandan Wright may or may not be ready, Turiaf figures to be a bench player.
Losing Davis hurts, because he combined with Ellis created one of the most potent backcourts in the league. But the quality of the new Warriors could surprise you. Depending on the rest of the West, Golden State could still threaten playoff contention.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-13-2008 @ 11:35AM
morris said...
Umm. Yes. YES. While not the team Mullin foresaw, Turiaf's post presence opens doors and adds new dimensions to a team which struggled to score in the half court.
Reply
7-13-2008 @ 8:24PM
pressrow said...
The Clips have had a bunch of seasons when they're better than other teams on paper. And, not only did those seasons never turn out well, but they are not better than GSW on paper,
Reply
7-14-2008 @ 10:41PM
goingforthemoney.com said...
Here is the bottom line. The W's are in an experimental phase and no one really knows how the chemistry will be and how well Monta will handle the point. He is most certainly talented enough to do the job. It will take some time but I don't see it taking all that long. He has adjusted well every step of the way and at a much quicker pace that any of us expected. With the speed that he has in a half season or so he will move up the ladder as a point guard. Remember he did play a lot more of the point in the second half of the season this past year and improved his handles and cut down on his turnovers.Think about this he is as fast as tony parker and to some degree a better shooter than parker. plus he attacks the rim as well as parker and in my opinion will become a better passer in time. Remember fella's you can't teach talent but you can teach a particular skill set.
Reply
7-15-2008 @ 4:12PM
Free Basing said...
Tommy boy,
I would like some of what you are smoking. PLeeeease, the Clips are better than Golden State on paper (which is all we have after all) and they are the somewhere between the third and the fourth best team in their Division. PLAYOFFS?, they will be on the worst teams in the league next year.
Reply