Over the past few days, a rumor which would traditionally drive the world mad has slipped by under the cover of the Olympics. Mo Williams, a dynamic second-tier point guard who signed with Milwaukee for big money last summer, would head to Cleveland to augment LeBron James' single-headed offensive attack while OKC's Luke Ridnour would transfer to Milwaukee and the Cavs would give the Thunder something or other (probably some expiring contracts -- fancy that). BrewHoop sums up the situation flawlessly.There are two competing questions in such a deal. The first, which we won't address fully in this post: is Ramon Sessions so good he makes Milwaukee's third- or fourth-best player (Williams) expendable? (Because Ridnour sure as spam ain't a sure-fire building block at this point. He'll start, but you'd think the goal would be to promote Sessions soon.) The question which actually matters to the league as a whole: can Williams push Cleveland over the top?
Cleveland was simply awful at the point last year -- 82games.com reports the positional PER was only 13. That includes minutes for Larry Hughes, Daniel Gibson, Delonte West and Damon Jones -- players substantially inferior to Williams. Mo offered a career-high PER of 17 last season, with good scoring, shooting and turnover numbers to go with a decent usage rate. (Usage measures the shot creation ability and offensive role of a player.) Williams would figure to be the second or third option in Cleveland, behind LeBron and perhaps Zydrunas Ilgauskas.
Cleveland won 45 games and took the eventual champs to seven games. Philadelphia and Toronto have improved by some measure, and another summer of seasoning for Dwight Howard might make Orlando better. On the surface, it wouldn't seem Williams' production is the difference between 45 and 50 games. But when you consider what he'd be replacing, I think it'd be as big an acquisition as Jermaine O'Neal for the Raps. If the trade goes through and Cleveland gives up little, it could help snatch a top-4 seed for the Cavs and give LeBron a better shot at getting back to the top of the heap.





















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-13-2008 @ 6:56PM
ron wolfe said...
Tom are you on drugs??? "the question that really matters to the league as a whole", come on, do you really believe that the good teams worry about the Cavs and Lebomb??? "help LeBron get back on top of the heap" when the heck did they win an NBA Championship with the ego maniac?????
Reply
8-14-2008 @ 3:32AM
hootie_69 said...
Did someone forget about the 2007 NBA finals already?
8-14-2008 @ 9:01AM
Mike said...
Some one might remind the other posts here that Lebron is 23 years old and would have just won his 4th NCAA title in a row if he had felt the need to do so. Being in the NBA Finals at 21 is not such a bad start, please go check when Jordan and whoever else you would like to compare Lebron to won theres and at what age. Should Lebron get ANY help at all, the Cavs will eventually win it all and then it may be several years in a row when they do. Look at who will be gone when Lebron turns 27, ahhh, like anyone who is anyone, Lebron will own this league then, not that he doesn't now.
Reply
8-16-2008 @ 8:09PM
Mr.G said...
Ron: Oh Brother!!! "help LeBron get back on top of the heap" refers to their Eastern Conference Championship in 2007.Now ask the 2008 Champion Celtics, if they were "worried about the Cavs and LeBomb",who they barely edged in 7 games.Now go look up James' stats,and compare them to ANY other players first 4 years,and you call him a "bomb" at 23 years old?You have the nerve to ask Tom if HE is on drugs?Did you type that garbage with a crackpipe in one hand?
Reply