Rick Bonnell of the Charlotte Observer published some notes on the free throw shooting woes of the Bobcats. Charlotte was #29 in the NBA at 71.4% from the stripe. (Philadelphia shot 70.6%.) The league average was 75.5%. Bonnell notes Emeka Okafor was a particularly egregious foul shooter, and reports Larry Brown has been working with him on technique heavily this fall. Good news.Henry Abbott of TrueHoop wonders how much all those misses (many by Okafor) hurt Charlotte last season. The impact is substantial enough, a few wins at the least. But this line drew my FT-fanatical interest:
They would have won games that they lost. Several of them. They would have felt confident and proud. They would have likely been fouled less, and gotten cleaner looks.The goal for Charlotte -- even Okafor, at 57% from the line -- should not be to get fouled less. Drawing fouls, it ain't beautiful. But it's one of most consistently successful strategies you can have.
Studies have ascertained that you can reasonably estimate the number of shooting fouls drawn by multiplying a player's FTAs by 0.44. (This accounts for the fact there are two FTAs per foul, as well as the presence of the "and-1.") Last season, Okafor scored 920 points on his 861 FGAs, or 1.06 points per shooting possession. In his estimated 165 FT possessions (that's 374 FTAs multiplied by the 0.44 adjustment), he scored 213 points, or 1.29 per possession. Even at his woeful clip, he was more efficient from the line than from the floor. Under this premise, given 100 FGAs he'd score 106 points. Given 100 trips to the line (200 FTAs), he'd score 129 points. That's a big difference. (Note: this ignores the idea that some fouls go uncalled. Everyone knows that never happens, though.)
The break-even FT% mark varies depending on a player's FG% (and threes complicate the matter further). But an easy rule of thumb: if you FT% is better than your FG%, you're better off drawing the foul. A limited number of regular players last year made the "Avoid FTs Club": Dwight Howard, Shaq, Tyson Chandler, Josh Boone, Chuck Hayes, Andris Biedrins and Jason Collins.
So Okafor should certainly work on that FT%, as should all NBA players. But very few should actually seek to decrease the number of FTs they take. In almost every case in the NBA, it's the best shot you can get.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-22-2008 @ 5:53PM
Bruno said...
Pretty bad use of statistics.
At the moment the player is fouled his expected FG% is ( on average) higher than his overall FG%. If that was not true nobody would ever commit a foul.
When Henry said that Okafor would be fouled less, he didn't imply that Okafor would be less agressive or draw less fouls. He knew that when Emeka started to have a better FT% , hte opposing players would guard him less closely and that would allow him to take those shots who have very high expected FG%.
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 5:55AM
Dave E said...
Ziller, given teams shoot FT's at over 70%, and FGs at less than 50% why do teams foul? Your above logic suggests given these percentages (Best of all Teams FG%, Worst of FT%) fouling would help the team being foulled.
Your logic does not explain why there is a strong correlation between a teams relative strength at shooting FTs and the number of FTs they get to shoot. That is the teams that suck at FT shooting generally get to shoot more FTs.
Surely, the worse a FT shooter you are, the better defensive play is to defend more 'strongly' turning high % shot into a lower % one - even to the extent of saying I'd rather foul than give up a dunk/layup.
Oh and BTW, I bet your 0.44 formula doesn't work for D-How he shoots way more and-1s...
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 6:19AM
Dave E said...
Ok, now I'm trying to get something constructive here. Your logic is teams don't just go out to foul Okafor here because he is a bad FT shooter. Let's compare to Shaq, Chandler and D-How 3 of your infamous you're better to foul list. Using you 0.44 ratio on FTA to determine FT "Possessions" we can deduce that Okafor spend 17% of his shooting posessions at FT line (Chandler 20%, Shaq 23%, and D-How 29%) However, both Chandler and Howard score 1.34 points per posession from the FT line compared to Okafor's 1.29 and that number is superior to their pps from the field (1.25 and 1.20 respectively)
Reply