
FanHouse's Tom Ziller argues his ranking of the top 50 players in the NBA.
Steve Nash's legacy needs no padding, obviously. Two MVPs don't come often -- Jerry West never won one. Thousands of kids have emulated Nash on the playgrounds this decade, and thousands more will continue to try to play Nash's style as his career tails off. Jason Kidd won't be forgotten, nor will Gary Payton or Brevin Knight. But the stylistic idol of this era of point guards will most certainly be Nash.
What's more: he's already influencing the game's top young point guards, like Chris Paul.
Paul is one of the best, most endearing young players the NBA has to offer. At age 23, he shows off canny maturity on the court: he knows exactly where to attack, how to throw even a great defense (like Dallas and San Antonio in the playoffs) off-balance, how to get his bigs and wings on the same path. These aren't unique traits for a point guard. But the way in which Paul executes them ... it's Nashian. The easiest example: the dribble-through. Nash keeps his dribble alive. Always. On penetration, if nothing's there around the rim, he'll dribble to the baseline and bring it back out. Too many point guards have the mindset that when they get within five feet of the rim, a decision must be made and no further circumstance can change the decision. You might drop off a pass if an opposing big lunges at you, but there's no real "stopping" now: the possession will be ended.
Nash, of course, lets the possession remain fungible. Every option is on the table on every dribble-drive. He might scoop it off the glass, he might drop it to Amare, he might lob it for Marion (R.I.P.), he might kick it to Raja, he might see no clear options and dribble out along the left baseline, then hit a cutting Barbosa in the lane. Nash begins his penetration with no preconceived notions of exactly how the possession will go. Most point guards give themselves one or two options.
Paul has mimicked this flawlessly. CP3 might turn to the alley-oop more often, but it's not a requirement. This isn't to say Paul aped this off Nash, and that he and Byron Scott aren't able to have an original thought or strategy. But it seems absolutely clear that this innovation (insomuch as it is one) has been popularized by Nash and the D'Antoni offense, and it has made its way into the repertoire of one of Nash's heirs.
Casting Nash as an inventor isn't the full story, of course: Nash has also been one of the game's best players in every practical sense. He can only do what he does by having such a deadly jump shot: you can't slack off him, lest you want to be killed by a thousand easy jumpers. He's one of few in the NBA who force the defense to adjust to his game. For a spate of the league's top offensive wings, the gameplan is largely the same: double on possession, trap on the edges, take away their best hand (you know, how teams should theoretically force Manu right every time). You can't pull something out of the box for Nash: he demands a special strategy. The plots Dallas used in the '05-06 Western finals (as documented in Jack McCallum's excellent Seven Seconds or Less) wouldn't apply to any other point guard in the league ... but they were necessary to slow down Nash, and by extension the Suns. Every coach in the NBA has a Nash strategy. Most don't work, of course, but he's one of the few teams must try to contain at all costs.
I'm still waiting for Nash's back to render him an afterthought. A lot of us -- myself certainly included -- put far too much faith in Mark Cuban's judgment in 2004 when he said Nash wasn't worth a paltry $10 million a year. It's a cop-out (and uninformed) to insist Nash is the hardest-working player in the league -- just because he's white and unathletic but won the MVP twice doesn't mean he's had to work harder than Elton Brand or Dirk Nowitzki or Kobe Bryant or Tim Duncan or Paul. Every player at this level works hard. That said, it's easy to imagine a world in which Nash didn't take every precaution to protect his health, to develop his mechanics, to lead the Suns to the heights. Thank God we don't live in that world, and here's to another half-decade of Nash brilliance.
NBA Top 50
No. 50, Andris Biedrins, Warriors





















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-24-2008 @ 11:16AM
ManofSteelo said...
Good article on Chris Paul.
Reply
9-24-2008 @ 11:34AM
ecash94 said...
Why can't Chris Paul just be Chris Paul? Why does he have to do things in a "Nashian" way? I'm pretty sure Nash did not invent the pg position, despite his amazing stats for the past 4-5 seasons. Didn't John Stockton also manage to keep his dribble alive as he probed the defense for openings? Maybe the more apt term is "Stocktonian."
You also say "Nash begins his penetration with no preconceived notions of exactly how the possession will go. Most point guards give themselves one or two options." Isn't that more a function of the offense Phoenix runs (or ran, since D'Antoni is gone) as opposed to Nash's instincts? He ran the pick and roll on a regular basis in Dallas as well, but didn't put up the same types of numbers that he has in Phoenix. I would assume that's because he didn't have as many threats who could finish on the break (Marion and Amare, two of the best at running the floor irrespective of position) or on the perimeter after receiving his kickouts (Bell, Barbosa, Joe Johnsons, James Jones, etc). Clearly he has had a deeper and more talented supporting cast during his years in Phoenix.
I'm not arguing your placement of Nash on the list, just the way you structured your argument for him.
Erik (Troy, MI): I'm a huge Wake Forest Fan and it has been a pleasure watching you these past few years. Who do you try and model your playing after?
Chris Paul: Not really. There are lots of guys that I try to take pages out of their book .. Jason Kidd, Isiah Thomas, Pistol Pete, etc.
http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=8314
Reply
9-24-2008 @ 11:49AM
frank said...
If we are talking about active players and accomplishments then Duncan takes the cake
and still Kobe is hanging close but Nash and
Boozer are not even close if individualistic they are
great players the potential for a trophy in the
NBA are not even close ;
So that applies to , Yao,Lebron and Chris Paul , for now;
Reply
9-24-2008 @ 12:03PM
carlo sexron said...
What a racket. Nash has to be higher on the list. He is much better than Dirk, D. Howard, Bosh, and others still left.
Reply
9-24-2008 @ 12:15PM
Jesse said...
So actually if you think about it what CP3 is doing is even more amazing because he is doing all these things Nash did but he is doing it without a shot. He does not have good range even compared to an average PG shooting wise, but yet he still gets by people constantly and disects a defense from the inside out. If Nash was doing all this at the age of 23 (!!!) and without a shot you could call what CP is doin " Nashian", but he is doing it at a much younger age, in a slower offense, doing all this while playing MUCHHHH better D and commenting less turnovers, and creating all this offense with no jumpshot - so in short i would have to say CP's game is his game and "Nashian". Lol just because the guy penetrates and dishes you wanna say his game is a copy of Nash's (shakes head) dumb, dumb, dumb
Reply
9-24-2008 @ 1:02PM
Jams said...
If Nash can continue to be the PHX Nash and not the Dallas Nash under Terry Porter then i will be impressed.
Reply
9-25-2008 @ 4:05PM
xphoenix87 said...
One of the things I wish you'd pointed out here, and one of the things that always blows my mind when I watch Nash, is how good his off hand is. Nash might be the best the game has ever seen at passing with his off hand. His ability to make one-handed passes with either hand while moving at any speed is truly special. As I've told people before, go out to your local gym and try what Nash does. Dribble at top speed down the middle of the lane with your off hand, then, with that same off hand, whip the ball across your body out to your buddy standing out at the three-point line. Forget hitting him in the hands, you're lucky if you get within 5 feet of him. It's Nash's ability to do anything with either hand, and to make accurate one-handed passes that makes him seem quicker than he really is.
Reply
9-27-2008 @ 5:43AM
sunnygreene said...
i wish you could have focused more on what nash actually does and his impact on the team, instead of how paul is nash-like (assuming but not conceding).
that passing's insane. remember against the spurs in the last playoffs, sandwiched between duncan and a spur (forgot who) and then he whips it around duncan's waist for stat to finish. :o
he can also finish on either foot. take off a step early and throw the big man off, leaving space for a floater or running jumper in the paint. it also lets him attack more comfortably from either side of the rim, add to the hand stuff above. if you've watched him consistently against tim duncan, diop, and the other bigs then you'll know what i mean.
Reply