Phil Jackson has put a temporary kibosh on the suggestion Lamar Odom may come out of the gate as L.A.'s sixth man, telling the assembled media in El Segundo Friday Odom will be the team's starting small forward. Jackson does leave open the possibility of a switch to Trevor Ariza at some point, should the combination need a tweak. Odom is the superior offensive player -- a talented scorer and distributor who knows the Triangle and is deferential enough to play with Kobe and Pau Gasol. Forum Blue & Gold seems on board with the "start the five best players" philosophy, and I tend to trust them on all matters Lakers.But we know L.A.'s offense will be extraordinary with or without Odom. The Lakers -- with a Kobe, Pau, Odom troika -- racked up amazing numbers in last season's stretch run and through three rounds of playoff basketball. Andrew Bynum will come in. He's a fantastic offensive weapon -- he's still learning, but few Western bigs will be able to keep him off the offensive glass or kill his half-hook and baseline spins. He's not Hakeem, but he might already be one of top five low-post threats in the conference.
If Odom starts, will Bynum get any opportunities? I'm of the mind L.A.'s offense would be just fine with Kobe and Gasol handling most of the duties: Derek Fisher can hit shots, Ariza can sprint in transition, and again, Bynum's good. If you can be assured your starting five offense will be dominant and bolster the starting defense (with Ariza over Odom) and the bench offense, isn't that a better use of your weapons? I think the opportunity cost of starting Odom is greater than what you'd give up making the switch.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-27-2008 @ 1:48PM
frank said...
I think Jackson is rethinking that was on his watch
the messy series for LA against Boston;
Against Denver the format that he implemented was
the one to follow all the way thru; He never did ;
With Utah he changed the format ???
Then again he settle with the Spurs and went back
to the format as with Denver;
Games 3, 4 ( especially, blowout) and 5 LA was suppossed
to win with ease against Boston with the same format
instead # 4 became the point of no return and again
changing the configuration of the series;
To me Boston from the get go was lucky just to beat the Young Atlanta team but instead that helped them to change the format and adapt for the following series
including the Lebron and the Cavaliers again that Boston was lucky to squezed at the end;
LA is a better team then Boston and Jackson knows it
this time around hopefully he will adjust the proper way;
Reply