The expectation for the Golden State Warriors in the Monta Ellis kerfuffle was to lay down a light punishment or no punishment at all. NBA teams aren't in the business of pissing off their best players for dumb but largely benign mistakes. For every Ellis, I have no doubt dozens of ballers ride motorcycles, snowboard, base jump, run with scissors, microwave floppy disks and do other assorted silly things which could fall under behavior clauses in their contracts. Basically, there's little to gain in terms of material benefit or future deterrence in slapping Ellis with a punishment. Ellis will stop riding mopeds whether you punish him or not. Punishing Ellis isn't likely to make an impression on Anthony Randolph, though.The Warriors disagree. Tim Kawakami reports the team has suspended Ellis without pay for 30 games. The guard expected to be out a few months, and would likely miss 30 games regardless. But the fine comes out heavy, almost $3 million. That's about 28% of this year's pay. (The Lakers took 10% of Vlad Radmanovic's cash when he injured himself snowboarding and lied to the team about it.) For a cat who'd only made minimum second-round scale money up to this point, that hurts.
Kawakami notes Ellis isn't around to answer questions, which leaves open the possibility Ellis and his camp aren't on board with this. It wouldn't be a stretch to imagine Ellis' agent working with the franchise to come up with the right "statement" to protect Golden State's stature while keeping the guard from losing too much. Based on the size of the fine and the lack of an Ellis presence in Oakland right now, it does not appear to be the case that Monta's camp is cool with this penalty.
(It's all worth noting that a Kawakami column from last week quoted Don Nelson and Chris Mullin as appearing to stand against significant punishment. The decision on the $3 million penalty came from team president Robert Rowell, Mullin's boss.)





















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-12-2008 @ 1:00AM
dekko said...
The fines are not set at 1/82 per game.
From the CBA which is posted at nbpa.com it has been changed from 1/90 which used to be for preseason games figured in as to how they were paid, to 1/110 of the total compensation per game played. So figure about 2.45 million
Reply
10-12-2008 @ 12:57PM
mesaman said...
What's the fuss? He wasn't that good to begin with and they'll never miss him. Think of it as a $3 million bonus to the franchise owner who is in the game to make money not friends. Have you ever thought these sneaker-freaks are overpaid to start with? Professional sports is a locker-room lottery and the winners, often unable to spell million, get to buy Lamborghinis and MBs and Escalades, and raise hell, then be immune to responsiblity. The GREAT American dream.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 2:41PM
henryclemente said...
I disagree. A big reason the athletes keep doing this sort of stuff is because they know they won't be held accountable. In fact they EXPECT not to be held accountable. So now, if a team even considers fining the player, they run the risk of "pissing the player off". If every team went ahead and penalized this sort of behavior, then that would eliminate the notion of a team "alienating" a player with fines, since he would have been fined no matter what NBA team he was with.
Reply