
FanHouse's Tom Ziller argues his ranking of the top 50 players in the NBA.
Kobe Bryant will never quiet his critics, and it has nothing to do with his personality, his jersey or his legal history. Kobe's divisiveness can be traced to the most basic quark of sport, the certain theme in one's observation of any game with sides and a scoreboard: the battle between team and individual.
Those who flash cudgels at Kobe think he is selfish, conceited, unsavory, a detriment to the perfect balance in panoramic basketball. If you love Kobe, you consider him a hoops God on Earth, a man who could easily wedge into idealistic basketball if his game wasn't so damn flawless on its own. Kobe ignores friends, or Kobe has no need for friends. Kobe is a hog, or Kobe is realistic about his skills. Kobe is overrated, or Kobe is the G.O.A.T.
Can there ever be a bridge?
(No, probably not: Kobe haters will not listen to reason, and Kobe worshipers will not listen to reason. The devoted in this matter -- the matter of Kobe Bryant, basketball player -- will never read a word of this with an open mind. As a basketball writer on the web, I have firsthand knowledge of this phenomenon: you cannot write a post [positive, negative or ambivalent] about Kobe without igniting a maelstrom of hate in both directions. My fellow bloggers can attest to this. It happens on every site, on every post, every single time.
Those of us with a nuanced philosophy on Kobe will sometimes write about him, and I have no doubt a few people [including other writers] will rationally digest any given Kobe post. But that is a tiny, tiny droplet, a medicine cap full of reasoned absorption amid a vast ocean of erratic, irresponsible passion. Ninety percent of the words spent on Kobe Bryant on the web are stupid, inflammatory and completely useless. I understand that, I await my punishment in the comments here and on various other message boards or blog threads. I have a bottle of sleeping pills and a Coke. I'm ready. Really.)
One of the greatest crimes against Kobe's legacy is that his otherworldly scoring ability isn't sufficiently credited. Eighty-one points gets headlines, and a streak of 40-point nights the same. But for reasons unknown, Kobe's singular ability to explode for massive scoring games carries a heavy discount in our consciousness. We credit Kobe for his all-around game, or his steady consistency, or his heart, or his passion, or his clutch ability, or his touch from unfathomable ranges. But no one ever makes the case for Kobe as simply the most fantastic scorer of our time. It's really that simple.
Bryant hardly wins the scoring title every season -- he has two such plaques to his name. That fact, as well as his spectacular but rarely referenced 25 points per game scoring average (No. 12 all-time), don't really illustrate the depth of Kobe's scoring ability. Perhaps this graph will help. The chart displays Bryant's points scored in each regular season game since the 1998-99 campaign (Kobe's first as a starter) in chronological order.

Literally, Kobe can go off for 50 points any damn night. He's been doing it for eight years, and if you take a second to visually extrapolate the graph out, he's going to be doing it another six years or so. He is a complete monster in the scoring ledger.
There are roughly 65 games a season in which an NBA player goes for 40 or more points, out of 1,230 games. So a 40-point night happens in roughly 5% of all NBA games. Since 2003-04, Kobe has played 370 regular season games. He has gone over 40 points ... 65 times, or in 17.5% of his games.
How often do the league's other phenomenal scorers explode for 40+? This graph compares the top six scorers of the decade. To account for LeBron's late start, each dot represents one game in which the player went for at least 40 points since 2003-04.

Kobe has done it 65 times in 370 games. The next on the list is Allen Iverson, who had 32 such games in 342 regular season matches. Adjust for the number of games each played, and Kobe went for 40+ almost twice as often as the next guy, A.I. (who happens to have a career scoring average of 27.7 points per game). The other top scorers can't even come close to Kobe in the explosive games count.
We continue to attempt to build other cases for Bryant -- he's a good passer when he has good teammates (Kwame vs. Pau), or that his will to win drives the youngsters around him to be better players (Bynum). F(orget) all that noise. Embrace Kobe as he is, not as we wish him to be. There is no one like him. Enjoy him for what he is while he's here, and stop making him out to be something he's not. Kobe Bryant does not need anyone to make excuses for the fact that he likes to score 50 points every once in a while. After the career he has given us, he really doesn't need anyone to make any excuses for anything he does on the court. He might not fit your image of the ideal, but he is quite succinctly a perfect NBA player. Enjoy him.

NBA Top 50
No. 50, Andris Biedrins, Warriors





















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
10-14-2008 @ 3:39PM
MoneyM said...
I knew the outcome of ur stupid Top 50 before you were even done. let me guess, Chis Paul is #2 and Lebron is #1.... That's why amateur journalists shouldn't be given blogs...
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 3:48PM
Brett Edwards said...
Fantastic job of breaking down Kobe's remarkable scoring prowess. Just wanted to get that in early before the s--- storm hits. Now, I will leave these comments, never to return.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 4:19PM
ecash94 said...
"Embrace Kobe as he is, not as we wish him to be." That's a great line, and it pretty much sums up the Kobe conundrum. Nice post.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 4:17PM
GQ said...
First let me say that I can not tolerate Kobe in any way. But there is no way he is number three - NO WAY. I am a Chris Paul fan, and in no way is he better than Kobe. I can't say that Chris Paul is better than Garnett and Duncan, but one can argue such a point. But Kobe....come on. And did I mention that I do not like her.....I mean him.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 4:19PM
Antwonomous said...
Excellent post. Couldn't have captured Kobe's inhuman scoring ability any better.
Don't see how he's not no. 1, though.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 11:11PM
Corbin Dallas said...
I totally agree with Money, this top 50 of urs is trash if you will put Lebron and CP3 ahead of Kobe, but i have to give you credit for the breakdown on kobe but you only focus on his scoring ability what about his defense, kobe is a consistent member of all defensive team.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 4:39PM
Tyler said...
Kobe at 3? how is that possible? that is just plain retarded. sorry man. I love how your broke down his scoring but 3? 3?!?! even kobe haters will be scratching their heads at this.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 5:19PM
Feature87 said...
I'm just a little bit confused...Kobe Bryant #3???
This dude is a legend...he is on the same level as Jordan was...so puttin Bryant at #3 is a dis towards Jordan. This player should be #1 without any doubt. Chris Paul at #3 and Lebron at the second spot that would be a much adequate order!
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 5:24PM
anny said...
I hate Kobe Bryant with the force of a thousand suns, but seriously #3? Paul and James are great players, but no way are they better then Bryant.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 5:46PM
Jams said...
Brett,
There will be no storm, previously, the Kobe army was waging a war on a thousand fronts but now we are at peace. Kobe does not need validation anymore, you see. He is an Olympic champion, MVP, carried a team to the final, even if TZ had him ranked 25th the response would have been equally as muted. We won, you see, no ranking can take that away.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 6:08PM
The Vuchine said...
I am a Kobe fan and i do understand the hatered this guy can conjure up. I mean like him or not though, you cant deny this guy is just a supreme talent and will go down as one of the best. His great attributes are also the reason he brings so much hate to him self. His drive to score can be attributed to his bull hog label. His approach to get the best out of his teamates can be misconstrude for acting like a prima dona and it goes on and on. But bottom line when its all said and done, he will go down with achievements n basketball few have ever achieved. He made the all star team when he was 19, perrenial all star yet more importanty perrenial all defense. Scoring title, NBA TITLES!!! and you know he's going to get another one with out Shaq. He holds or held the record for most consecutive 50pt games, 3 pointers in one game, consecutive 3ptrs without a miss and of course 81 pts in the modern game, by a guard! I mean when he riters and we're watching espn classic seeing his 2004 finals game against the Piston when he single handedly beat that piston team for the only laker win in the series. Your going to look back and say, this guy was one of the best. I should've appreciated his talent when it was unfloding in front of my eyes. And again a man of this basketball ability and accolades is no 3 on your list, in the middle of his prime??!!! I understand your probabaly factoring in age and long term success but i mean come on!! Even if this was top 50 for the next ten years, the last ten years or top 50 for this season he should be number 1!!! or atleast number 2 (i'd lidten to an argument about Lebron, i mean after game 7 last year. WOW!) but ya this man deserves his props and desrves to be placed in the rightful place in basketball history of this time. Best player of this era by far and he is placed 3 on this list. I mean good analysis but doesn't show why he is below two other players
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 6:33PM
supersloth said...
hmm, I don't know if I agree with the #3 ranking, but that was a fantastic write up about both Kobe's abilities as well as the argument for and against him.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 6:54PM
chi c said...
lol at everybody saying...Im not a kobe fan but he should be number 1.
put lebron on the 07-08 lakers minus kobe they win the title
put kobe on the 07-08 cavs minus lebron they dont make the playoffs
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 7:54PM
cjg said...
chi c, you have got to be kidding. Are you forgetting that kobe led a worse lot of teammates (smush, kwame etc) to the playoffs in the WEST 2 years ago with an identical record to cleveland last year. Also, lebron (with the exception of games 7) played historically bad, shooting under 20% against the same celtic team, so I fail to see how he could have had any more success. And you are saddly mistaken if you think he would have made the laker teammates play better because they just plain choked (see lamar odom) and you can't help that
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 8:22PM
Alex said...
Beautiful post, thank you Tom.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 8:50PM
there07 said...
Tom Ziller is a Kobe hater guys...what do you expect???
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 10:22PM
David said...
Great Kobe writeup.
Agree with the ranking. CP3 and Kobe are in a dead heat, IMO. Either one could be #2.
Reply
10-15-2008 @ 7:59AM
the best said...
dont you what he is doing. he is a laker fan and is trying to give them even more motivation than what they need. Kobe at #3, yeah right. I love lebron and cp3 ahead of him. comin now, i play basketball professionally and say what you want about kobe, the players know that he is the real deal. a killer, lebron doesnt have that yet and cp3, a killer instinct but not equal to kobes
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 11:03PM
TJ said...
Even the guys that hate Kobe's guts will admit that he should be number 1. He simply is the best player in the NBA, with an honorable mention to Lebron, who is a great player too.
TOP 3
Kobe Bryant
Lebron James
Chris Paul
Reply
10-15-2008 @ 12:14AM
Martin said...
Any attempt to rank players hinges largely on the relative weight you give to the many attributes each player brings to the court. For example, in your rankings, how much weight do you give to each of the following:
1. 3 point shooting percentage
2. Mid range shooting percentage
3. Free throw shooting percentage
4. Offensive rebounding ability
5. Defensive rebounding ability
6. Passing ability
7. Perimeter defensive ability
8. Shot blocking ability
9. Ball handling (dribbling) ability
10. Age
11. Height
12. Quickness
13. Athleticism
11. Leadership
12. Ability to bring out the best of his teammates.
And each individual player's statistics will vary considerably based on how good his teammates are. If he is surrounded by good players, he will have a lot of open shots, easy passes for assists, and easy offensive rebounds. If he is not surrounded by good players, the opposing team will focus their defensive efforts on him, bringing down his statistics.
The rankings will vary drastically, depending on how much weight you give to each of these attributes. Thus, although this attempt to rank players is a nice, intellectual exercise, one could come up with completely different rankings, merely by changing the relative weights of the various attributes used in evaluating each player.
Reply