
LeBron. Kobe.
Kobe. LeBron.
In a little more than five days, LeBron James and the Cavaliers will travel to Los Angeles to take on Kobe Bryant and the Lakers. It is their first meeting of the season, and only the 10th meeting ever between the two superstars. Kobe has three rings, yet none without Shaquille O'Neal. LeBron has been crowned the king since his arrival in 2004, but has only one Finals appearance. LeBron fills a stat sheet in incredible ways; Kobe won the MVP last season. Kobe is the embodiment of lethal precision; LeBron the next step of athletic evolution.
In a season filled with "Games of the Year," this is unquestionably the Game of the Year.
Over the next five days, we'll be bringing you posts about metrics and legend, nuance and intensity, and speed and power, in anticipation of this matchup. We look forward to sharing with you our anticipation of this game, between not only two giants in basketball, but the two best teams in the league. We'll have haters and lovers of both players, defense and prosecution of both sides of the Kobe V. LeBron schism. We all have opinions about it, as we're sure you do. We invite you to share, because we won't get many of these, and we should enjoy every one. Not only are these two exemplary entities of the NBA, but their teams aren't too shabby either.
The Lakers started the season with a dominance rarely seen in the league. They've trailed off a bit, particularly defensively, but the question is whether it represents a fundamental flaw or a lack of interest in the regular season. The fact is they share the league's best record, have won convincingly and consistently, and feature an incredible lineup. Pau Gasol on the inside with Andrew Bynum. Experienced dream killer Derek Fisher at point, The Machine Sasha Vujacic the shooter off the bench, and the instant energy Trevor Ariza. Cleveland, on the other hand, has the best incarnation with James it has ever had, hitting on all cylinders on offense as well as defense. The addition of Mo Williams has sparked the backcourt with Delonte West and Daniel Gibson, and provided James with the offensive weaponry he has long asked for. The game's supporting cast make up a formidable set of rotations, deep and versatile.
But ultimately, everything comes back to Kobe vs. LeBron. Through their nine meetings, LeBron owns the series, 6-3, leading in points, rebounds, assists (!), steals, and blocks, but also leading in turnovers. He's outperformed Kobe in FG% and, amazingly, 3 point shooting, but of course trails at the stripe. It's important to note that in the first two games they played at Staples, Kobe was suffering from a shoulder injury in 2004 and a tweaked ankle in 2005. Still, you have to give the numbers edge to LeBron.
This matchup represents something greater when you take it to the philosophical level. Kobe is so often compared to Jordan, and for a long time, it was merely due to them both being guards and the level of greatness that Kobe has risen to. It's an unfair comparison for dozens of reasons, but there is an intricate link between the two, and it is what separates him from LeBron. Kobe is the natural evolution of the path Jordan set. Not better, but the final link in the elite shooting guard chain: The post-up turnaround fadeaway, the running leaner, the quick striking dunks, the shut-down man defense. Everything that an NBA player is supposed to be at his height, Kobe has become. And while he may never reach the level of Jordan (and I'm not definitively saying he won't), he's to be considered in that line. He's the modern payoff for the work of history.
LeBron, on the other hand, could be considered the next step in basketball evolution. While it's true we've seen point forwards before, players with power that could pass, who could drive and could handle, we've never seen this combination. And the haters will note how easy it has come to James. While Bryant has had to work endlessly, mercilessly, to become the greatest he can be, LeBron is largely more athletically gifted than 99% of the planet. This matchup represents precision built by resolve versus lethal efficiency built by determination. Kobe wills himself to be better than you, better than anyone; LeBron asserts self-determination to be a force of nature.
And, as always, something's gotta give.
What will be lost in the breakdown of shooting, living up to their own standards, and in each team's finals hopes is how amazing these two players are, and how incredible it is that we get to see their careers intersect. It's a golden era of basketball we live in, and this game is a shining example. Where amazing hap...no. Hope you'll enjoy it. We know we will.





















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-14-2009 @ 10:32AM
frank said...
The big difference is that Lebron is without big Z
and Verajao is ? close but no cigar but Kobe has
Gasol, firm plus,plus ( Bynum & Ariza) plus, plus.
Reply
1-14-2009 @ 10:50AM
Cahill said...
(i will preface this by saying I am from cleveland and have been a cavs fan thru the "dark days" of santa kemp, wrong way ricky and darius miles") Both these guys are great players but ill take lebron just for the fact you never will hear him throw a teammate under the bus...people used to point out that kobe was a much better defensive player(which was true), however this year its a different story...The real reason though that lebron is better? both have played on crap teams where they were expected to do everything and when lebron was saddled with his bunch of losers he took them to the finals(to get smoked i know but like i said im from cleveland and getting to the final round is an accomplishment in this town) while when kobe gets saddled with a less than talented team its a first round exit..i think thats all the proof you need..
Reply
1-15-2009 @ 10:22AM
wilzuvsteel said...
Cahill,
I understand your loyalty and bias towards Lebron but when the Cavs made it to the finals you forget the East was very soft and the West was stacked. Teams made it to the playoffs that year in the East with sub .500 records. As you can see in the Finals your Cavs did get swept but you failed to recognize this was what the West was at that time.
But Lebron & Kobe are great competitors and deserve any and all accolades that they receive. I enjoy both players skills and talents for what they are as well as MJs in respect to the era he played in. Remember MJ didn't win anything in the 80s because of great teams like the Lakers, Celtics, Pistons. It wasn't until those teams got old that he started winning. He was a product of all those beat downs. Now with all the changes to the rules in today's game it is a completely different league with different styles of play. So for me to compare Kobe to MJ is short sided and to compare Kobe to Lebron is short sided because Kobe's been in the league 3 times as long as Lebron and still is on top of his game. Either way the team who wins in the Finals ultimately gets that last word. Go Lakers!
1-14-2009 @ 1:14PM
mac said...
you can't discount the fact that when lebron took the cavs to the finals, the east was a joke. the #8 seed warriors that year probably could have made it to the finals if they were in the east. that being said, both players are insane, tough to pick just one.
Reply
1-15-2009 @ 11:37AM
cahillio said...
Wil- that is true the east was weak that year(still is outside the top 3 teams) but lebron did have to dismantle the pistons(who were probably on par with most of those west teams, san antonio excluded) looking at the lakers until this year and last year they were no better than a 4 or 5 in the east(maybe a 3). My point is that ill take lebron because he has the ability to drag a crappy team to places they should not be...i have yet to see kobe do that whether in the east or the west..
Reply
1-15-2009 @ 3:59PM
cp34president said...
Cahillio, I am a Chris Paul fan so I will be unbiased in this commenting. But when you say you have yet to see Kobe Bryant take a horrible team anywhere, I ask you to recall when the lakers didn't make the playoffs in 2004. In the offseason Kobe clearly stated on TV that he would not let that happen again. Then in 2005 he had the highest scoring average since MJ and hasn't missed the finals since. And if you compare the Kobes teams in 2005-2007 to the kings when he went to the finals, look how much worse Kobes was. And lets not forget 81 points either. I think you can't really compare them until their careers are said and done. Good luck to them both
1-15-2009 @ 4:16PM
cahillio said...
cp3- didnt kobe have caron butler on that 04 team?(im not sure if it was 04 or 05 but i know he spent one year there and after that they got lamar odom so kobes teams have had some talent) when the cavs went to the finals they had amon ones(no d, no j)ira newble(garbage) and eric snow's corpse pulling major minutes. outside of big z,larry hughes, dan gibson and drew gooden on the cavs teams from 05 to 07 nobody even had any business playing in the nba. also kobe has only made one final since 05...so im not sure what league you watch..
Reply
1-15-2009 @ 5:52PM
Evan said...
Kobe led a team that had no business in the playoffs to the playoffs. Without Kobe in 05-07, the Lakers would surely be in the last 2 spots of the Western conference. And the Lakers were literally 1 rebound away from putting away #2 Phoenix behind Kobe's heroics, so I put that at the same level as Lebron's game 5 performance against Detroit. If Kobe's Lakers were in the East the year Lebron went to the finals, not only would the Lakers have made the playoffs, but they would have gotten at least 1 game against the Spurs instead of getting swept. Stop saying Lebron "carried" the Cavs to the finals because he didn't. He would have been in the same boat as Kobe if he were in the Western conference, so what Lebron "did" is nothing greater than what Kobe did.
1-15-2009 @ 5:58PM
Evan said...
Kobe had nobody in 05-07. Lamar, Kobe's #2 man, was an inconsistent sham, and Kobe's starting point guard and center were Smush and Kwame. They could not even get bench time after getting traded to the worst teams in the NBA. Lebron's team mates, even though not the best either, were still better than what Kobe had and was considered one of the top defensive teams. And consider the fact that for multiple years, Lebron played the Wizards in the first round without Arenas one year and without Arenas AND Butler the next year. The only great moment Lebron had was that game 5 against Detroit, which I commend him for. But the rest of his playoff run to the final was a piece of cake that any low seeded team in the Western conference could have done. Lebron's fortunate he's in the Eastern conference.
1-15-2009 @ 6:06PM
Evan said...
The year the Lakers had Caron was the first year after Shaq left, which left the team in shambles in terms of personnel. The entire team got gutted pretty much, coaches left midseason, players got injured. Any team would have missed the playoffs in this type of circumstance.
2-12-2009 @ 10:24PM
Brandon said...
Its a tough decision. Lebron can guard all 5 positions and is a lot younger than Kobe right now. So today I would take Lebron to start my team but if I could have them both at 25 then im not sure. I found a list of their achievements and its quite impressive. Check it out. Who would you take?
http://www.gotoguy.com/2009/02/04/whos-the-nbas-go-to-guy/
Reply