That headline's a lark in the real world, but one of those cooked-up future realities in the mind of Jersey native Shaquille O'Neal.Steve Politi of the Newark Star-Ledger has a perplexed Shaq talking about the absurdity of the Nets playing in an N.J. city not named Newark.
Given the barricades blocking the Atlantic Yards project that would send the Nets to Brooklyn, Shaq's talk (after the jump) about making the Newark Nets a real deal don't sound too far-fetched.
Newark has a new arena -- the Prudential Center -- where the New Jersey Devils and Seton Hall Pirates play. Shaq asserts to Politi that the Nets should be playing there, too.
"I have no idea why the Nets aren't playing there," Shaq said. "It makes no sense. I know they're trying to get to Brooklyn, but if I was the general manager or the owner of that team, I'd be playing in Newark right now."IZOD Center in East Rutherford is a pit, attendance has always been awful and Nets owner Bruce Ratner reportedly loses a mint on the gym every year. But Brooklyn has been the prize, and no detour south was thought to be needed. When do the delays slowing Atlantic Yards make Newark worthwhile to Ratner?
Earlier this month, sources told the New York Daily News that the Brooklyn arena project is almost dead. I have no special insight in Ratner's mind, but would he want to continue to own a franchise "stuck" in Jersey? (No offense meant toward N.J.; clearly, a Brooklyn NBA franchise is more valuable to its owner than one playing in Jersey.)
Shaq has that base covered too, telling Politi he'd be open to an ownership role with a prospective Newark NBA franchise, Nets or otherwise. Of course, we've heard this all before. Like two months ago, when Shaq said he and Grant Hill plan on buying the not-for-sale Orlando Magic. Or another team.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-22-2009 @ 1:25AM
dj kahn said...
I live about 5 blocks from the Atlantic Railyards in Brooklyn, the proposed site of the new arena, as well as condos etc. Other than using eminent domain to kick out a lot of residents and tear down a few buildings, NOTHING is going on in the way of construction. Any new date that Ratner puts on the table is far-fetched at best. I would love to see the Nets in Brooklyn, and was initially excited. Then I started meeting people whose lives are being adversely effected by the process. Add to that the fact that Ratner has done absolutely nothing to improve an already downtrodden block (physically, not spiritually or mentally) in the mean time, and my excitement needle is pinned on zero. The whole deal was extremely fishy to begin with; Ratner's bid for the rights was not even the second-highest (he has a lot of very good friends in high places). He needed the fantastical wool of NBA basketball in a hoops-oriented borough to pull over people's eyes; it didn't work out. Brooklyn Nets will remain a fantastic idea that, because of poor execution and zero sensitivity, will never happen.
Reply
1-23-2009 @ 10:59PM
jdbreeze1 said...
If the Nets really want to represent New Jersey, they'll move to Trenton. not only is it the capital, but it's also more centrally located, so the team can stop ceding the southern two-thirds of the state to the Sixers.
Reply