If a rivalry between LeBron James' Cavaliers and Kobe Bryant's Lakers doesn't come to pass, it's not going to be because the two have formed an off-court relationship in recent years.It will be because one of those teams -- and likely one of those players -- faltered on the way to the NBA Finals. And not just faltered this year, but next year and the year after that and so on.
There's no doubt the NBA fraternity of players has gotten more close-knit over the years, and nobody likes the excessive glad-handing and embracing before games. But so what if James and Bryant are friends?
Dislike or even deep resentment isn't a prerequisite for a rivalry, although it can enhance one. What you need for a rivalry are a couple of great players on a couple of great teams, and a mutual respect between those players and teams.
In the mid-1980s, Larry Bird's Celtics and Magic Johnson's Lakers were staples in the NBA Finals, and nobody would question whether or not that was a rivalry. It was The Rivalry.
But at the height of it, Bird and Johnson taped a television commercial for Converse, which both players were wearing at the time. In the ad, Bird was on a court in French Lick, Ind., when a limousine with Magic Johnson approaches on a dirt road.
Johnson, in the commercial, tells Bird that he had heard Converse made a shoe for "last year's MVP," but that they also had made one for "this year's MVP." The reference was to Bird winning three consecutive MVPs, but that Magic was going to win the next one.
Bird and Magic always mention this commercial as a turning point in their relationship. Both acknowledged they didn't have much of one prior to that, in large part because of their 1979 NCAA Championship game.Bird and Magic said the taping of that commercial made them realize they had a lot in common, borne mostly out of their shared Midwestern roots. Quite simply, they became friends.
In 1987, a year after the taping, the Celtics and Lakers once again went at it in the NBA Finals. The Lakers won in six games, with Johnson's baby hook in Game 4 being the series' signature bucket.
Let's be clear: the Bird-Magic friendship didn't diminish their rivalry one bit, and it certainly didn't take away from that series. Not that I can recall, anyway. What put an end to the Bird-Magic/Celtics-Lakers rivalry more than anything were the Detroit Pistons and Bird's bad back.
Wilt Chamberlain and Bill Russell were another story. Yes, there was said to be a dislike between them during their playing days. But the two were cordial, respectful and, yes, maybe even a little friendly after their playing days were over.
It's worth pondering whether or not their relationship would have been different had they played in a different era ... say in a more modern time. Surely, their paths would have crossed more frequently, and they would have had some mutual business opportunities to consider.
Point is, it's difficult to imagine Russell being any less intense or Chamberlain being any less fierce had they enjoyed a relationship or friendship. Simply put, that's not giving either of those men enough credit for the competitors they were.
So, maybe James and Bryant don't hate each other. Maybe they hug and chit-chat and make nice before tip-off or on off days or in the offseason. And maybe they are complimentary about each other.
That doesn't mean they can't have a rivalry. And it won't be the reason why they don't.










Comments (Page 1 of 1)
this is a good thing if the rivalries aren't fueled by some real or artificially trumped up dislike/hatred of the other players. It's actually adult to compete highly with those you value...almost a brotherly or sisterly thing...and they compete hard...you can look at the Willliams sisters as an example...each one works very hard to beat the other and yet off the court (and even on in doubles) they work together. It's just that they are competitive athletes and when they game's on the line they want to win. It's the same for the more adult athletes in the league. They played together on the olympics and now compete and even relish the competition with their former teammates. Only athletes with 'issues' still feel the need to generate false rivalries, or amp up some kind of hatred in order to compete...it's sad really and silly...
Kobe doesn't care who you are, he wants to cut your balls off. LeBron doesn't have that assassin's gene..
hilryshaves, you may be right. I hadn't thought of it, but what you say makes sense. Good comment. As O'Reilly would say, pithy.
Sorry, but the so-called Russell-Chamberlain "rivalry" was mostly in Russell's and the Media's minds! Chamberlain could, and did dominate the game, in a manner that Russell never could, or ever did!
dinohealth, I agree 100%, finally someone says what I've been saying for years! Bill Russell was nowhere near as dominant as Wilt. As for their rivalry, wasn't it great (even if contrived)to think they disliked each other? Is the hugging and hand shaking really a good thing? Only in the current soft NBA-LITE we have today.
seeing the type of person kobe is. I would think he has to be a little jealous of lebron. Just like jordan, kobe doesnt like to share the spotlight
kingmole
what would kobe be jelous of hes the best player in the world he will get something lebron wll never get 3 chamionships and 10 time all nba defensive