On Monday, the NBA announced that Kenyon Martin was being fined $25,000 for a foul that occurred in the first quarter of the Nuggets' Game 1 win over the Mavericks. The play in question saw Martin play some physical defense on Dirk Nowitzki, get whistled for a foul, and then shove Dirk to the ground once the play was over. Martin was given a technical at the time, but the question is this: Why are the officials so afraid to make a definitive and punitive call during the game, when it would clearly have the strongest effect?
Here's the play in question, and there's no doubt that this was (a) not a basketball play, and (b) came clearly after the referee's whistle blew.
Nowitzki had started off the game hot, so this was likely a move that was meant to intimidate him and cool him off a bit. I don't have a huge problem with the play, and if those were K-Mart's intentions, that's fine, and they seemed to do the job. But the referees need to call it as such at the time it happens, and not leave it up to the league a day later to determine it was worse than it was believed to be at first glance.
How do you not call that a flagrant foul at the time? A personal foul followed by a technical in that situation doesn't even make sense, really. The play should have either been upgraded to a flagrant foul, or, if it was deemed to be separate than the initial foul and so egregious, then why not an ejection?
Referees in this post-season have been afraid to make high profile decisions like this in real time; if you don't believe me, look no further than the multiple cases involving apparent golden child Rajon Rondo.
I'm not saying I want players kicked out of games or suspended for every little thing, and I was against the idea of suspending Rondo for Game 7 -- despite the fact that his throwing of Kirk Hinrich to the scorer's table in Game 6 was deserving. No, Rondo should have been tossed for that early in Game 6 -- when the play actually happened.
A lot is made of referees trying to get control of chippy games, when they make multiple calls in a short period of time to slow the aggression. But letting plays like Martin's (and to a larger extent, those of Rondo) go down with nothing more than a slap on the wrist, well, it's setting a bad precedent as the playoffs become even more competitive in the later rounds.
At some point, a player is going to go too far in an attempt to intimidate an opponent, and that opponent or his teammates will take matters into their own hands to retaliate. And the referees will have nobody to blame for it but themselves.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-05-2009 @ 4:09PM
Mike Rath said...
Ask David Stern-----
Might have something to do with revenue.....
Reply
5-05-2009 @ 4:36PM
yaaas1 said...
whats with all the sissy complaints about a hard foul, this is why I don't watch sports much anymore. Rules like in football - unnecessary roughness. Give me a break. Eegneads have taken over sports as they have all other sectors of society. Common sense thinking people are vanishing from public life... we will all be robot like and controlled before long...
Reply
5-05-2009 @ 6:53PM
lingreen62 said...
Why is it that you can practically count all the white players in the NBA playoffs on one hand, and all the rough or flagrant fouls are all committed by blacks on white. Just by the mere percentages, this should be rare, indeed, not the norm!
Reply
5-05-2009 @ 7:43PM
D_Average said...
My God! Either call it then or don't call it at all! And how about some consistency? This is nothing compared to the way Rondo smacked miller like a prostitute.
Just reaffirming the well known fact that the NBA has the worst officiating in all of sports. And its not like this stuff is hard to gauge either. It much tougher to be consistent with 10 guys on a small court thatjudgeing 22 men on a 100 yard field in the NFL, yet they look like geniuses compared to these doofs. I blame all of this on David Stern. He's brain-dead.
Reply
5-05-2009 @ 9:01PM
Dave D. said...
Can you call a flagrant foul on a dead ball? That was my assumption on watching the play, that a flagrant wasn't an option, so the next best thing is a tech. Perhaps it's a loophole (and thus a bad rule), rather than bad officiating.
I don't think the foul's so bad as to warrant an ejection -- Nowitzki obviously sold it and the free point of a tech and not every non-"basketball play" is ejection-worthy. The possibility of a subsequent ejection later is clear punishment, and nobody was in danger of being injured and it didn't seem to be Martin's intent to injure Nowitzki, just to intimidate him.
Still, it was clearly a "flagrant" if that call is allowed -- my question is, is it?
Reply
5-06-2009 @ 12:24AM
ferenc said...
the reason that black players target whites for hard fouls is that they are RACISTS.
Reply
5-06-2009 @ 6:08AM
obamaizadope said...
Dirk likes to come high with those razor elbows, and K Mart just said enough..
Reply
5-06-2009 @ 5:45PM
sportsfntic22 said...
I think its just payback for all those times he elbows players
Reply