OK, sure. They traded their franchise player a year and a half ago for Kwame Brown and some Skittles. And yes, with the No. 2 pick they managed to select the only basketball player available who's biggest weakness is his ability to put the little ball in the big circle with the net attached (which I hear is kind of important). But hey, they needed to rebuild, and they rebuilt. But they have tons of cap space now, so much in fact, that they're actually under the CBA limit and have to spend some. So they've stopped torturing their fans with one terrible decision after another right? Right? Guys? Anybody?
Oh, hi Zach Randolph. What are you ... doing ... here ...?
Oh, no.
OK, so it could be worse. The Grizzlies did need a low post scorer very badly, and God knows Hasheem Thabeet won't be filling that role. And while Randolph's still got $33 million over two years left on his contract, the Grizzlies have the space to add Randolph and still offer significant extensions and add free agents over the next two years.
But then again ...
Zach Randolph?
We're talking about a free-agency period with limited expectations, that happens to be heavy on power forwards. Paul Millsap. Brandon Bass. Charlie Villanueva, until the Pistons snatched him up. There were options to be had, for less than $33 million over two years. That kind of money could have gotten you a younger, more efficient power forward without the locker room issues, conditioning issues, off-the-court issues, and being-Zach-Randolph issues.
They traded Pau Gasol, pardon me, now-world-champion Pau Gasol, because he had a big huge contract and was older and they wanted to start over. So they went out and got Zach Randolph, who's contract is eerily similar to Gasol's. Because, you know, that makes sense. What you really want when you're rebuilding and looking to the future is to pay for multiple years on a locker room cancer with questionable work ethic who's contract expires the year after the best free agency period in history. Yeah, that.
As Kevin Arnovitz of ClipperBlog said on Truehoop, L.A. found a sucker, and can now let Blake Griffin riot down low to his heart's content, and add pieces next year. This move may signal more, though. This may have been the official passing of the torch by the Clippers to Memphis for "Worst Franchise In The NBA."
Ye gods.





















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-02-2009 @ 1:08AM
Lakergregg said...
Looks like Memphis is now all of LA's bitch.
Oh,and Memphis didn't win the lottery that's why they have Hasheem Thabeet.
Reply
7-02-2009 @ 1:38AM
ericL said...
Any franchise involved in a trade for Zach Randolph just made the biggest mistake in the franchises history. Example Knicks, Clippers, and now Grizzlies. I'm sorry matt I know you were horrified about the possibility of this trade. What is next? Trading Marc Gasol for Adam Morrison? Zach Randolph the man who gave the 20 and 10 a bad name.
Reply
7-02-2009 @ 9:25AM
claytor said...
Neh, they prolly wont make another Lakers move, considering the last deal was a Jerry West collusion fueled special. Stern looked the other way once, doubt hed do it for another Gasol.
Reply
7-02-2009 @ 9:33AM
MenoRikey said...
Some cities should just not have a franchise.
Reply
7-02-2009 @ 9:48AM
mikerat42 said...
Randolph was once a Knick-- Nuff said???
Reply