Pardon my speculation, but Sports Business Journal (subscription required) followed up on the latest corkscrew in the Hawks' ownership roller coaster by adding this loop: the Atlanta Spirit group which bought the Hawks, NHL Thrashers and Philips Arena in 2004 could sell the whole shebang amid heavy losses.The news hook is that the Spirit has enlisted Goldman Sachs to trudge up some additional minority investors to infuse some cash for extant team owners. Face of the ownership group Michael Gearon Jr. told SBJ's John Lombardo that while the Spirit has no plans to sell the Hawks, the group wouldn't turn down a "crazy price" if someone offered it.
Given the circumstances, a "crazy" offer may not be too far-fetched. If such an offer materializes, it could put the NBA in a tough position.
Again, this is all speculation stemming from Gearon's "if we get a crazy offer" comment. What would a crazy offer be? Clay Bennett and friends bought the Sonics for $350 million in 2006. That didn't include an arena, and Forbes had pegged the franchise's value at $234 million in 2005. Clearly, that's a bit of a crazy offer, yes? Bennett paid a premium to get a team he felt he could move easily. (Which he did.)
The Grizzlies, eternally up for sale by owner Michael Heisley, cannot move easily. There is a massive penalty -- more than $100 million -- to pay if the Grizzlies leave Memphis's FedEx Arena. It is incredibly unlikely the Grizz will move before 2012 at the earliest -- later in the decade would be more feasible. The lease issue and penalty constitute a huge reason ownership groups from Kansas City and Anaheim, San Jose and St. Louis, Seattle and Las Vegas haven't lined up to make a play for the Grizz. That team is nothing like the Sonics, who had no strings to hold them down.
But the Atlanta Spirit group owns its arena. If the Spirit wanted to relocate the Hawks to Calgary, there'd be no lease issue in Atlanta. Sure, it wouldn't be smart -- I mean, they own an arena in a massive market, and arenas are one of the biggest costs pro sports team owners face. And I'm not aware of any great demand for pro basketball in Calgary.
... but I am aware of one in Kansas City, where lo! there is an NBA-ready arena ripe for the filling. Similarly, Steve Ballmer's group of Very Important Men in Seattle could put together a decent plan for a renovated KeyArena at any point -- they have the money. Owners of the Pond in Anaheim have been hunting for an NBA team to join the NHL Ducks for years now, recently making public overture to the Maloofs, owners of the Kings. Is it so ridiculous to imagine a prospector from one of these towns making a big Bennettian offer to the Spirit? How much would do the trick?
The group of owners would either leave the arena in local hands, or take it and spin it off. It'd be terrible to see the Hawks leave, even if crowds remain less than buoyant and if local support is limited. Tomes have been written about Atlanta's pro sports fandom, and I don't aim to investigate that now. All I know is that NBA relocation is all about opportunity, and by leaving open the possibility that the Spirit can be bought out, the owners of the Hawks have put on neon top hats and tin foil suits. This is an opportunity for some NBA-hungry city, and I imagine we haven't heard the last of it.
(As to the tough position the NBA would be in if such an offer materialized: the precedent set by the Sonics move was that if cities don't help foot the bill for arenas, teams will move, no matter how long they have been a part of the community. The Hawks have a fine arena in Atlanta. A move couldn't be pegged to a lack of local financial support ... although I imagine the argument would be tied to Atlanta's lack of fan support. It'd be a trickier argument from an economic standpoint, though.)




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-25-2009 @ 10:56AM
RMJ=H said...
Is the NBA still opposed to a team in Vegas? I've always felt like it was just a matter of time...
Reply
8-25-2009 @ 12:38PM
suitman36 said...
the reason for no sports teams in nevada is simple. las vegas. no league will allow a team to play in a state where there is sports betting. why? who knows.
8-26-2009 @ 12:21AM
Giles said...
The problem isn`t really legal gambling in Nevada. The have that in New Jersey, but they also have the Nets. I oppose legal gambling, among other things legal in parts of Nevada, but the Nba is just engaging in one of the media`s favorite passtimes, being hypocritical. New York is not going to be denied a team in Jersey, the Commissioner is in New York.
8-25-2009 @ 11:35AM
Koch said...
WHO CARES? basketball isnt even a sport.
Reply
8-25-2009 @ 11:53AM
Jackie M said...
your a idiot...you probably think ice skating is a sport dummy
Reply
8-25-2009 @ 1:20PM
underda4 said...
they must be a neckcar fan opps i mean nascar thats not a sport basketball is
Reply
8-25-2009 @ 2:13PM
Ed Fielding said...
Move them to the Phillapines and re-name them the Manila Folders.
Reply
8-25-2009 @ 6:22PM
Giles said...
Missouri (Kansas) City, Thebes (St. Louis), AnaHeim, Silicon Valley (San Jose), Seattle, Tampa, San Diego, would be wiser to sell the Nba that dumping 6th, 8th, and 10th men, by creating 6 expansion teams, would cut payroll, and stop trying to play musical chairs with existing teams. Calgary has their Stampede, to rodeo fans, that is better than Nfl, Nba, Mlb. Maybe right up there for Canadians with soccer and ice hockey. But some of the rest of us like the Nba. But if the Nba had a team in Las Vegas, what the Commissioner`s Stern did in Vegas wouldn`t stay in Vegas, so no way are the getting a franchise (unless someone throws a lot of money around, of course).
Reply
8-25-2009 @ 7:21PM
Giles said...
And do you notice, all the cities the article mentioned are WEST of the Nba`s center of gravity? The Nba is still lost in the `50s tonight. Good song, not a good way to live. They still think of New York is the most popular city in the most popular state. Wrong. Convert L A county east of L A city into Apple or Blue county, combine it with Orange county, as ONE city, the existing cities becoming burroughs. Even with L A a suburb, not part of the new city of Hollywood, Ca., even before urban renewal, it would be more popular than New York. Skiing in the San Bernadino mountains. Beaches where you can swim winter between string bikinis, not having to wear a scuba suit and hack thru the ice. Grow up media/Nba. Cal is #1, Texas is #2, Florida is #4. New York is a 4th rate has been! Great in Autumn and Spring, outside the crowded city, just popping into town on business. It would take a lot more than buying the Kings` name for a team in Brooklyn to make the City liveable, like cutting off the tops of the skyscraper death traps where emergency teams can`t reach becuse New York learned nothing from the Tower of Babel. More than half the US population is west of the Missouri, much less the Mississippi! But the Nba still counts teams east of the Mississippi in the West.
Reply