OUR FANHOUSE TOOLBAR INTEGRATES THE LATEST SPORTS NEWS INTO YOUR WEB BROWSER AND INSTALLS IN SECONDS.
YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE TOOLBAR HERE.

NBA

Debate in the Paint: No Question MJ 'One of the Greatest' of All Time

Michael JordanEvery Tuesday this summer, two of our NBA experts will go at it with a Debate in the Paint. This week, the topic is Michael Jordan and his upcoming induction into the Basketball Hall of Fame. Is Michael Jordan the best player in all of basketball history?

Hey, I drew the short straw. So, I don't want to hear it. It's come down to me to argue that Michael Jordan isn't the greatest player in NBA history.

Don't get me wrong, I can do it. It's just that I don't go out of my way to pick a fight and this would seem to be doing just that. No, I don't think Jordan's the greatest. But I also know it's tough to win. Hence, the short straw. Nevertheless, here goes ...



Give me Wilt Chamberlain or Bill Russell or even Magic Johnson over M.J. I'll leave Larry Bird out of this one. But I'd take any of those previous three over Jordan.

Perhaps the single-biggest reason Jordan is considered the greatest of all-time is because he won six championships. Without those half-dozen championships Jordan has far less of a foundation to win such an argument.

So, we'll start by attacking the foundation. If Jordan has just two or three titles, it's a different ballgame entirely. And the fact of the matter is that Jordan didn't face the same kind of competition ... say, Magic and Bird did on their way to titles.

Jordan had the immeasurable luxury of not having to go up against the Lakers and Celtics when Magic and Bird were in their primes. We know that Magic wins another title if Bird isn't in the picture, and Bird probably wins another two titles if Magic isn't around.

But how many titles does Jordan win if Magic and Bird are around? Jordan had no peer, and neither did the Bulls. C'mon, they faced a different opponent in each of their first five Finals appearances.

Taking it a step further, here's what I maintain: If you replaced Jordan with Magic -- or Russell or Chamberlain, for that matter -- the Bulls of the 1990s still win six titles ... and in that case we're talking about Magic like we talk about Jordan.

\Don't forget, for as great as Jordan was he did have trouble for the longest time incorporating his "supporting cast." One has to believe a player like Magic would have done that a little better, and more quickly, no?

And speaking of Jordan's later supporting cast, let's not sleep on Scottie Pippen and Dennis Rodman, two of the more underrated superstars of their day. Pippen was a three-time All-NBA First-Teamer and one of the greatest perimeter defenders in the history of the game.

Rodman was the best rebounder of his time and one of the best interior defenders. Point is, Jordan had a squad around him. It wasn't all just Jordan.

And here's the last thing, while Jordan's career assist (5.3) and rebounding (6.2) numbers are solid, they aren't comparable to Magic and Bird's numbers. Bird, a forward, averaged more assists than Jordan, a guard, and there's no way Bird had the ball in his hands as much as Jordan. And Bird could impact a game on the glass, which Jordan never could.

Ditto for Magic, who's got Jordan on rebounding and passing, and shooting percentage too. Look, Michael Jordan was a great, great player -- one of the greatest of all time ...

What's wrong with that?

More Steinmetz on Twitter: @matt_steinmetz

Related Articles

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)

GOT SOMETHING TO SAY?